Presidential Slugfest 2016 - Debate Watch Party!

[MsTinkerbelly]

Originally Posted by C0LLETTE

She wouldn't be using his children against him. She would be exposing his ugly core. She isn't attacking his children she is exposing that his attitudes towards women extend even to sexualising his children.
She doesn't have to say it but her surrogates can....and I doubt anyone hearing it would conclude "poor Donald" look how she is pointing to how he talks about his daughter.

You really think people would turn away from her for pointing out what an abusive perverse parent he is?
And there are lots of indirect ways to make those references. That's why they have "surrogates".

You need to read what I said without implying anything else.

I said SHE cannot bring up the issues of him sexualizing his daughter, or ANYTHING negative about his children. That doesn't mean a surrogate can't do it, it just means it cannot come from her mouth.